![]() * CPU utilization: 30-50% (with iMotion 10, Detail Boost 5, Light Boost 5) This 720p an extreme one, with the other test file (suggested from Joco1114) I have a "normal" result:Įnvironment: ATI HD 3400, Q9550 1GB A-DATA EE DDR2-1000 I had to back up to 10.02, because with this new Catalyst 10.11 I had 2x blue sreen death.) My card is an ATI Sapphire HD 3400 with Catalyst 10.02 (I have installed and tryed today Catalyst 10.11, but no change in CPU/GPU usage. Have you ever considered upgrading to Win 7 ? What card is it, by the way ? Also Win 7 may interface better to it than XP. Also your graphic card's driver will be almost surely much more updated under Win 7 than XP. ![]() However Win 7 may be more efficient at using quad cores. I use both players: for dedicated play I use Splash, but if I would like to use my HTPC during the movie playing, I use PP.Īviwil wrote:Big Foot, I would have expected better for a quad core. But it uses a lot of system resources but someone without my sharp eyes cant see the differences. I get smooth movings and with a little video control manipulation I get nice result. Check video renderer settings and you will see, that I use EVR resizer with Direct3D 9Ex. ![]() PotPlayer cant calculate the frames between frames. ![]() I think it also hangs on CPU and GPU speed. With 10 it is smoother, ghosts are fusing into one. Sometimes I get "ghost movings": it means I see more than one object at the same time. I hate 2012 but it is a good sample, camera shakings, fast movings. So, I definitely see the differences betweeb 1 and 10. I wast too clear, sorry, it comes from my poor english knowledge. ![]() So similar to Splash Pro on which Motion setting ( 1, 5, 10 ) ? With my settings to Potplayer you will get similar (not the same!) quality like Splash Pro. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |